By Meg Dare
Saturday, April 30, 2016
Back in the Saddle Again.
By William McRight
Sorry friends for that far too pregnant pause in my guttural utterances. My new (real life) employer has an onboarding program that requires a 30-day visit to the other side of the country where your days are packed with classroom training, presentations, evening shenanigans etc. And, by the way, I think I fought hard against adjusting to PST. 3:30 AM wakeups and desires for dinners at 3:30 PM were the order of the day. But we are back from that so – Let’s get at it.
The State of the Race
When we last spoke, the great American Con Job was continuing apace and the Big Orange Not Even Republican (I cannot believe it took me this long to come up with that name-If we use just the first letters, it is even better) was holding on to his lead in delegates and people who are NOT voting for him. It also came to common knowledge that the other orange creep who everyone loves to hate, Boehner, can’t stop running his stupid mouth about how much he hates a consistent conservative. Ponder that for a second. The man who got removed from his job as Speaker for being a slimy, orange creep had a PAC that took $100k from another slimy orange creep. Sounds to me like two guys who are on the same side of our problem. So naturally, let’s support one of those guys for President. It kind of boggles the mind in regard to the lack of sophisticated reason and political acuity of a large part of the voting block in this country.
Senator Cruz continued the fight daily in any way he could, despite the small army of sycophantic Trump tongue bathers in the media. He continues to chip away at the Trump inevitability lie with a grassroots effort focused on results and winning, not stupid polls. Reminiscent of Reagan, Cruz took the bold move of naming his running mate, Carly Fiorina. This space will harbor future musings on the ticket but safe to say now I will give it a thumbs up for strategery and timing. After Trump’s Acela Corridor wins, changing the discussion was mandatory. Cruz did that, boldly, to his credit. However, I am a shameless hack and he could’ve chosen your Aunt Millie and I’d find a way to make it a political master stroke.
During my time of being a responsible adult, Trump gave some sort of a foreign policy speech. In complete transparency, I cannot bring myself to watch it. I did watch a six second Vine where a presidential candidate invented a new country called “Tanzania.” I also noted that Coulter and Ingraham saluted Trump’s inane warbling with all the gusto that a real conservative would salute Reagan’s “A Time for Choosing.” Those two saying anything positive regarding Trump renders it factually void and tacitly stupid. So I probably won’t watch Trump’s “important foreign policy speech.” Because he is a real estate developer and doesn’t know his rear end from page 8.
So here we are. Another Tuesday primary where the most consistent conservative since Reagan “has to win” to keep hope alive. To date, all the have to win places have resulted in Cruz victories. If we are to save our nation from having a choice between two morally fouled up Democrats to serve as our next President, we need to keep working and tweeting and commenting and fighting. C’mon Indiana. You’ve got this.
Sorry friends for that far too pregnant pause in my guttural utterances. My new (real life) employer has an onboarding program that requires a 30-day visit to the other side of the country where your days are packed with classroom training, presentations, evening shenanigans etc. And, by the way, I think I fought hard against adjusting to PST. 3:30 AM wakeups and desires for dinners at 3:30 PM were the order of the day. But we are back from that so – Let’s get at it.
The State of the Race
When we last spoke, the great American Con Job was continuing apace and the Big Orange Not Even Republican (I cannot believe it took me this long to come up with that name-If we use just the first letters, it is even better) was holding on to his lead in delegates and people who are NOT voting for him. It also came to common knowledge that the other orange creep who everyone loves to hate, Boehner, can’t stop running his stupid mouth about how much he hates a consistent conservative. Ponder that for a second. The man who got removed from his job as Speaker for being a slimy, orange creep had a PAC that took $100k from another slimy orange creep. Sounds to me like two guys who are on the same side of our problem. So naturally, let’s support one of those guys for President. It kind of boggles the mind in regard to the lack of sophisticated reason and political acuity of a large part of the voting block in this country.
Senator Cruz continued the fight daily in any way he could, despite the small army of sycophantic Trump tongue bathers in the media. He continues to chip away at the Trump inevitability lie with a grassroots effort focused on results and winning, not stupid polls. Reminiscent of Reagan, Cruz took the bold move of naming his running mate, Carly Fiorina. This space will harbor future musings on the ticket but safe to say now I will give it a thumbs up for strategery and timing. After Trump’s Acela Corridor wins, changing the discussion was mandatory. Cruz did that, boldly, to his credit. However, I am a shameless hack and he could’ve chosen your Aunt Millie and I’d find a way to make it a political master stroke.
During my time of being a responsible adult, Trump gave some sort of a foreign policy speech. In complete transparency, I cannot bring myself to watch it. I did watch a six second Vine where a presidential candidate invented a new country called “Tanzania.” I also noted that Coulter and Ingraham saluted Trump’s inane warbling with all the gusto that a real conservative would salute Reagan’s “A Time for Choosing.” Those two saying anything positive regarding Trump renders it factually void and tacitly stupid. So I probably won’t watch Trump’s “important foreign policy speech.” Because he is a real estate developer and doesn’t know his rear end from page 8.
So here we are. Another Tuesday primary where the most consistent conservative since Reagan “has to win” to keep hope alive. To date, all the have to win places have resulted in Cruz victories. If we are to save our nation from having a choice between two morally fouled up Democrats to serve as our next President, we need to keep working and tweeting and commenting and fighting. C’mon Indiana. You’ve got this.
About Obamas recent trip to the UK...
By Ecklebob Chiselfritz
Let's face it, Barack has been an asshole toward England since day one of his ever downward spiraling tenure.
The die was cast early on in his administration when the White House returned a bust of Churchill to the Brits.
It was a gift from them, but I guess Barack didn't like it since it wasn't stamped Made in China.
He then gave the Queen an iMaxiPad loaded with his 2008 campaign speeches.
That is a sad pathetic fact.
To her credit she didn't strap it on, turn the volume way up, take thirty Tuinals and drink a bottle of Beefeater Gin.
If I was Queen Elizabeth and Barack Obama requested an audience with me my reply would be, "No thank you. I am very happy with my current butler".
Let's face it, Barack has been an asshole toward England since day one of his ever downward spiraling tenure.
The die was cast early on in his administration when the White House returned a bust of Churchill to the Brits.
It was a gift from them, but I guess Barack didn't like it since it wasn't stamped Made in China.
He then gave the Queen an iMaxiPad loaded with his 2008 campaign speeches.
That is a sad pathetic fact.
To her credit she didn't strap it on, turn the volume way up, take thirty Tuinals and drink a bottle of Beefeater Gin.
If I was Queen Elizabeth and Barack Obama requested an audience with me my reply would be, "No thank you. I am very happy with my current butler".
Friday, April 29, 2016
Lonely and Horny - Where Trump Supporters Go to Meet
by Kim D.
A little about the creators . . .
.
So, yeah, now there is a dating site created specially for Trumpsters looking for love. It's simply called Trump Supporters Meet. One can jump on and search for mate in a matter of seconds - after paying either $8.99 for a monthly subscription or, for the really challenged, $49.95 per year.All profits from https://t.co/ZvwFJKIRsr are donated to Trump for President, Inc. #Trump2016 #TrumpDatingSite— TrumpSupportersMeet (@TrumpDatingSite) April 26, 2016
A little about the creators . . .This website was founded by Donald Trump supporters in Sonoma County, California. We have long been silent in our political beliefs, but we refuse to be any longer. For far too long, media critics who add no societal value and cheap prostitutes within our government have demonized and morally devalued everything that made the United States of America a great nation. We as patriots have a duty to break our silence, and select a President that will respect the wishes of the citizens who elect him.
Mike Pence Chooses Country over Self #CruzFiorina
by Kim D.
Indiana Governor Mike Pence has been in the hot seat lately. Would he or wouldn't he endorse a Republican primary candidate?
Would he stay silent, betting on the notion that being lukewarm in such a volatile primary would better his own chances for reelection or a presidential bid of his own in 2020? Would he capitulate principle and try to give Trump the huge boost he would need toward securing the majority of delegates needed to win on the first ballot at the GOP convention? Would he paint with bold colors and stand behind the candidate who is the true Constitutional conservative?
Today Pence answered these questions. He endorsed Ted Cruz and confirmed that he will be voting for a Cruz/Fiorina ticket in the May 3rd primary:
Indiana Governor Mike Pence has been in the hot seat lately. Would he or wouldn't he endorse a Republican primary candidate?
Would he stay silent, betting on the notion that being lukewarm in such a volatile primary would better his own chances for reelection or a presidential bid of his own in 2020? Would he capitulate principle and try to give Trump the huge boost he would need toward securing the majority of delegates needed to win on the first ballot at the GOP convention? Would he paint with bold colors and stand behind the candidate who is the true Constitutional conservative?
Today Pence answered these questions. He endorsed Ted Cruz and confirmed that he will be voting for a Cruz/Fiorina ticket in the May 3rd primary:
"I'm not against anybody, but I will be voting for Ted Cruz in the Republican primary," Pence said in an interview with WIBC's Greg Garrison. He praised Cruz's "knowledge of the Constitution" and his willingness to "take on the leadership" of his own party.Pence expects to campaign with Cruz and is in discussions with the Texas senator's aides about scheduling, he told CNN after the radio interview.
Thank you Governor @mike_pence for your support!#ChooseCruz: https://t.co/uyE3WEApzohttps://t.co/0nxgMz0Rrk— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) April 29, 2016
Liberal website Vox explains why liberals are so smug
You
would not expect to find this at the Vox website, but Emmett Rensin has hit a
home run: He explains why liberals are so smug. (As you read, think of the
poster child, MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell.)
The
article – click here --
is long but worth a read. More gems:
I
predict that Mr. Rensin, a Vox editor, will be kicked out of the Good Liberals
Club. After all, they always know best.
Retired Woman Confesses How She Cheated Her Employer for 25 Years
Boston, Mass., April 21, 2016 — Andrea Andreeson, 64, has written a tell-all book
confessing to cheating her employer for 25 years by playing a game instead of
working.
How Spider Solitaire Saved My Sanity is available on Amazon.com, both Kindle and
print versions. The old spinster says she took the job because she thought she
could meet highly eligible husband material in the workplace. As she says in
her book, “I never intended to be at this job for long. I was pretty, and
of an age to still be viable. I knew C-Tap Corporation attracted smart men who
needed wives to help them advance their careers by throwing parties for clients
and bosses. I was that woman.”
 |
| Andrea Andreeson demonstrates how she could look busy to the boss casually walking by. She was quick to point out that she kept the back of the monitor toward the boss’ line of sight. |
Though she also confesses to —
and gives some darn good details about — several affairs of the heart, alas,
none ever lasted for too long, much less led to the marriage her heart coveted.
As the years passed, and not being the least bit interested in her job, she
passed the time away by playing Spider Solitaire on the company provided
computer.
Andreeson said, “Frankly, when I first started playing
the game on the computer, I did it because my job duties were light, and I
wasn’t going to go looking for more work, that would be stupid. But I was
bored. Then, of course, when that first affair ended, I was devastated. Playing
[the game] helped take my mind off my troubles, you know? I could see so many
married men were unhappy with their wives. I knew I could be that thing that could
complete them.” But time after time, she was wrong.
As
outlined in her book, she said there came a time when she realized the company
was not doing enough to attract single men to the workforce. She felt they had
tricked her into coming to work for them and that, therefore, they owed her
since the percentage of men they hired (99.75 percent) were married, and the
0.20 percent of the single men were gay, thereby bringing down the ratio
of single woman to eligible single man.
“I
have no guilt associated with cheating [C-Tap]. I deserved every penny I got
out of them. They should be happy I didn’t sue them,” said Andreeson.
Researchers
have been quick to point out that it is impossible to get accurate statistics
about this workplace time waster because Spider Solitaire is housed on
local machines needing no Internet connection, therefore access is
untraceable.
Walter Gilson Ph.D., professor emeritus from MIT,
said, “I wanted my thesis to be on the subject of Spider Solitaire as played at
work during hours employees were on the clock. It was my contention that
employees wasted time because of certain deep psychological needs. I believed
if we could identify those needs then we could tweak the workplace to
accommodate those psychosis, and therefore employers could get value for
the hourly rate they paid people they hired.”
Dr. Gilson submitted his outline to his peer
committee, then quickly and quietly was informed he should, as he told this
reporter, “Drop the subject, as there are things here you do not want to
understand and that should never come to light.”
It
is possible Andreeson’s book has turned a bright light onto the
reason the researchers did not want Gilson to study the subject: Women’s
rights activists would have come out of the woodwork to sue the
university. They knew they would lose in the court of public opinion, their
insurance rates would rise because of the lawsuit, and the go-away money pot
was getting smaller by the day.
C-suite executives at C-Tap Corporation (NYSE: CTAP)
declined to comment with this written statement sent by email, “We decline to
comment.”
In the meantime, Andrea Andreeson is enjoying her
retirement knowing that in the long run she “…stuck it to The Man but
good.”
For those interested in the
history of the computer game, please click this link here.
Thursday, April 28, 2016
OMG -- some hack media critics are offended
By Mouser the King Cat
A young woman named Sara Dayley made a wise decision last year when she walked away from a reporting gig at the NBC affiliate in St. Louis. She became the spokeswoman for the West County EMS & Fire Protection District, reportedly for $65,000 a year. Now she wants to moonlight on weekends at the Fox affiliate, anchoring the morning news.
A young woman named Sara Dayley made a wise decision last year when she walked away from a reporting gig at the NBC affiliate in St. Louis. She became the spokeswoman for the West County EMS & Fire Protection District, reportedly for $65,000 a year. Now she wants to moonlight on weekends at the Fox affiliate, anchoring the morning news.
This arrangement
drew a raised eyebrow from Joe Holleman of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch:
When
asked about potential conflicts of interest, Dayley referred questions to
Audrey Prywitch, news director [at the station]. Prywitch said that because the
station is aware of Dayley’s other job, "We’re even more cognizant (of bias),
because we don’t want to appear to have any kind of bias.”
Then Mr.
Holleman called on Al Tompkins, a former news director who teaches at the
Poynter Institute. He huffed and puffed: “
At some point, let’s either be a
journalist or let’s be a public relations spokesperson. The public already
suspects we show favorites. … Disclosure minimizes the sin, but it doesn’t
erase it.”
I’m
guessing Mr. Tompkins has never watched TV news on weekend mornings. It’s a
continuous loop of stories from the week before and breathless updates twice an
hour about mayhem from the night before. The weatherman appears a lot; maybe the
sports staff left something useful. Anchoring said broadcasts for hours is a chore few volunteer for.
In this
case, the disclosure is on the record. It has been decreed that any story involving
the West County EMS & Fire Protection District will be presented by Sara’s
co-anchor. Give Ms. Prywitch credit from a creative solution that will sit well
with bean counters and the news staff. Call the naysayers what they are – hacks
who witness real biased reporting every day and never call it out.
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
Short Thought About The Studly Bill Clinton, But Too Long For Twitter...
Ever notice that of all the many women who have accused
@billclinton of sexual assault not one woman has ever come forward to say he
is hung like a stallion and performs like Man O'War in bed?
It’s a College Student…Hide Your Wallets!
by Meg
Dare
Meg
Dare here. I’m a college student. Wait, wait, wait! Before you hide
your wallet and click away from this page, I’m not like most college students.
Your wallet is safe with me, no worries. Seriously. I don’t expect you to pay
for any gender studies or cultural awareness courses. I don’t think you should
help fund my trip to Europe. And I don’t think you should pay for any sexual
escapades I may or may not regret at the local frat house. Okay, we cool?
 |
| Photo Credit |
I know
you’re thinking I must be as mythical as the unicorn. I admit, there are a very
small number of us who think like this, but we exist. I think I can speak on
behalf of the Constitutional conservative college students and say that we
think sticky-fingered, entitled higher-education-whiners put Victorian
pickpockets like The Artful Dodger to shame. Plus you couldn’t be mad at that
face, just look at him. College students are looking more and more like science
fiction beasts complete with strange odors harkening to the 70’s Hippie Era.
I was
debating the topic of taxation (your wallets) with a college friend the other
day. She insisted that European Socialism is the bomb. Best thing since Fig
Newtons, not to be confused with Wayne Newton…and especially not to be confused
with Wayne Newton covered in fig leaves. I apologize for the image.
Anyway, my friend thinks numerous things from higher education to healthcare to
birth-control to abortion, etc. should be paid for by the government, i.e.
taxpayers. But she also thinks it is none of taxpayers’ business how others
live their lives. I was flabbergasted. I said, “So let me get this straight.
You want people to pay for your life choices and shut up about them?” She
nodded as if what I said wasn’t heinously ironic.
Millennials
and modern college students screech for freedom (having things handed to them
is the equivalent to freedom in their minds) and forget about freedom’s sadly
ignored cousin: responsibility. You know, he’s the one at Thanksgiving who has
to sit at the kiddie table because there aren’t enough chairs. People interrupt
him when he has a hilarious story, while forgetting to pass him the cranberries
too. He also gets picked last in gym class.
To
paraphrase our Founding Fathers, freedom must always be coupled with
responsibility; otherwise we create these self-important, entitled, childish
“adults” who constantly have a hand out and a belligerent attitude. But don’t
mind me, I’m just one of the few who think responsibility is worth hanging out
with and is not so bad at dodgeball, either.
By the way, your license is about to expire and you have a lovely family.
By the way, your license is about to expire and you have a lovely family.
Compliance! Well, excuuuuuse me…
ROTW Contributor: Angela Durden
The brief video below, a clip compilation from Flight of the Navigator shows how I feel about the CAN-SPAM act.
The brief video below, a clip compilation from Flight of the Navigator shows how I feel about the CAN-SPAM act.
Many
do comply with all the rules and regs, which entire compliance has
done nothing but seriously hamper our ability to find new business. But
many do not comply.
Supposedly it is against the law to put people on an
email list without their not signing up first. Okay, there are ways around
that with a friendly message that says you aren’t wanting to bug them
and hey, see how easy it is to unsubscribe at any time, among
other qualifying criteria. Of course, if you’ve done business with them
already, then it’s perfectly fine to send emails since you are communicating
with a customer.
All that is understood. But here’s the reality and the
frustration.
Reality One: Companies who are offshore
(though you might not know it) do not have to comply with U.S. law, often
making make their unsubscribe buttons invisible.
Reality Two: People we meet at
networking events who rush back to their computers and put us on their email
blasts and we get every campaign they send. Now, I don’t have a problem with
that, because I think this is great. Here’s their contact info. Here’s how I
can learn more about what they do. Awesomely efficient. Isn’t technology grand?
Then comes…
Reality Three: We put them on our email
reach-out lists thinking they are cool with that because didn’t they add
us to theirs first, right? But the first time we send something to them, they
are unsubscribing and reporting us as spam.
Well, excuuuuuuse me!
Is Target P. C. Whipped?
ROTW Contributor: Angela Durden
I stood up for Target last year during the Great
OCD Sweater debacle and
was proud of them for standing up against radical rabble rousers. So, when I
heard that they had caved against the radicals who only cared about where
their own private parts would be able to relieve themselves, well, you can
understand I was in disbelief. But there it was. Bold as brass on their
website. You can read their official positioning statement here on their
site.
Specifically
they say, “Most relevant for the conversations currently underway, we welcome
transgender team members and guests to use the restroom or fitting room
facility that corresponds with their gender identity.”
(Bold italics are mine.)
What? Is Target P. C. Whipped?
Say isn’t so, Big T.
Who in your legal department thought it was a smart
idea to spit in the eye of the vast majority of your customers? Now, don’t go
getting your panties in a twist (and you’ve got a lot of those to get twisted)
and hear me out.
I shall now define for you who the vast majority of
your customers are. They are fine, decent, hard working, tax-paying,
think-for-themselves folk of all genders, ages, ethnicities, and sexual
orientations. In other words, common sense folk who aren’t radicals and who
like you for what you are: a purveyor of goods they need. Common sense folk
don’t need you to be anything else.
Radicals only march to get attention on themselves.
Radicals do not care about anyone or anything except themselves. Radicals only
care about a very narrow subset of a situation and then seek to force that on
all people everywhere as the ruling law. Radicals seek to force you to care
when you already do, they just don’t like how you are showing that care.
Radicals cause corporations a ton of legal trouble. Common sense folk don’t.
But you see, the vast majority of your customers,
thinking for themselves, are not radical and have quietly chosen the bathroom
they want to use without making a production of it. They didn’t hold up a
megaphone and say, “I want to be a man [woman] and therefore I shall use the
female [male] bathroom…and you better not try to stop me or else I shall sue
your a**.”
Ronald Reagan speech: 'Man is not free unless government is limited'
Pop quiz - who does this sound like? Trump, Kasich, or Cruz?
The YUGE Primary Win in the Northeast #Trump2016 #Clinton2016
by Kim D.
Last night five northeast, liberal states held their presidential primaries and previewed the potential challenge between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. One of Trump's strongest arguments for his bid for the Republican nomination is that he can win states that in past elections have voted overwhelmingly for the Democratic nominee - i.e. the blue states.
Last night proved what most conservatives have been saying all along - he can't. In a match up between Trump and Clinton, she wins and does so "bigly." Let's take a look at the results:
Connecticut:
Trump: 28 delegates - 122,519 votes
Clinton: 27 delegates - 169,713 votes
Total Republican candidate votes: 208,176
Total Democrat candidate votes: 322,658
Delaware:
Trump: 16 delegates - 42,472 votes
Clinton: 12 delegates - 55,950 votes
Total Republican candidate votes: 67,807
Total Democrat candidate votes: 92,609
Maryland: ,
Trump: 35 delegates - 237,132 votes
Clinton: 53 delegates - 533,656 votes
Total Republican candidate votes: 419,751
Total Democrat candidate votes: 815,356
Pennsylvania: ,
Trump: 17 delegates - 892,702 votes
Clinton: 91 delegates - 918,649 votes
Total Republican candidate votes: 1,537,696
Total Democrat candidate votes: 1,638,560
Rhode Island: ,
Trump: 9 delegates - 39,059 votes
Clinton: 11 delegates - 52,493 votes
Total Republican candidate votes: 60,381
Total Democrat candidate votes: 119,213
Total Trump delegates won: 105
Total Trump votes won: 1,333,884
Total Clinton delegates won: 194
Total Clinton votes won: 1,730,461
Total Republican votes cast: 2.293,811
Total Democrat votes cast: 2,988,396
So we can follow along with the liberal media and celebrate the yuge wins last night for the Donald, that is if we are blind to their agenda, knowing that the Republican party is on the edge of nominating the one candidate who loses bigly to Hillary in November - numbers don't lie and they are in Clinton's favor in a general election. We can also follow along with the Common Coreish dumbing down of the primary process and admit that the one who wins the plurality of votes must be elected president because the voice and will of the American people will have spoken.
Another significant factor to consider is that when compared to the last time Clinton ran for her party's nomination in 2008, the Democrat voting turnout has slipped by 20%. By all indications, the Republicans have increased voter turnout; however, it appears to be not enough for a Republican to win in the traditional blue states - even if Bernie fans decide to stay home should Clinton win the nomination.
What's more telling are the states in which Sanders beat Clinton handily, the ones who came to the polls determined to say "Never Hillary." Most of these are in the West and have also indicated that they are either conflicted about Donald Trump or they say "never" to him.
So what's the point? If the "Never Trump" voters stay home, Clinton wins handily. On the converse, if the "Never Cruz" voters, who appear to mainly reside in the Northeast, stay home, so what - the Republican nominee will not win these liberal leaning states but would have a good chance to best Hillary with the support of more conservative populated states. Bottom line - in a liberal vs. liberal match up in the 2016, Hillary wins by simply running in the party with which she openly identifies.
The moral of this story, based on factual numbers, is that the only way the Republican party wins the White House in 2016 will be if they have a nominee that paints with bold colors and offers a stark contrast to the progressive Democrat nominee. Trump nor Kasich fits this profile. Only one man - one candidate in this race does. Can you open your eyes and see who that is?
Last night five northeast, liberal states held their presidential primaries and previewed the potential challenge between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. One of Trump's strongest arguments for his bid for the Republican nomination is that he can win states that in past elections have voted overwhelmingly for the Democratic nominee - i.e. the blue states.
Last night proved what most conservatives have been saying all along - he can't. In a match up between Trump and Clinton, she wins and does so "bigly." Let's take a look at the results:
Connecticut:
Trump: 28 delegates - 122,519 votes
Clinton: 27 delegates - 169,713 votes
Total Republican candidate votes: 208,176
Total Democrat candidate votes: 322,658
Delaware:
Trump: 16 delegates - 42,472 votes
Clinton: 12 delegates - 55,950 votes
Total Republican candidate votes: 67,807
Total Democrat candidate votes: 92,609
Maryland: ,
Trump: 35 delegates - 237,132 votes
Clinton: 53 delegates - 533,656 votes
Total Republican candidate votes: 419,751
Total Democrat candidate votes: 815,356
Pennsylvania: ,
Trump: 17 delegates - 892,702 votes
Clinton: 91 delegates - 918,649 votes
Total Republican candidate votes: 1,537,696
Total Democrat candidate votes: 1,638,560
Rhode Island: ,
Trump: 9 delegates - 39,059 votes
Clinton: 11 delegates - 52,493 votes
Total Republican candidate votes: 60,381
Total Democrat candidate votes: 119,213
Total Trump delegates won: 105
Total Trump votes won: 1,333,884
Total Clinton delegates won: 194
Total Clinton votes won: 1,730,461
Total Republican votes cast: 2.293,811
Total Democrat votes cast: 2,988,396
So we can follow along with the liberal media and celebrate the yuge wins last night for the Donald, that is if we are blind to their agenda, knowing that the Republican party is on the edge of nominating the one candidate who loses bigly to Hillary in November - numbers don't lie and they are in Clinton's favor in a general election. We can also follow along with the Common Coreish dumbing down of the primary process and admit that the one who wins the plurality of votes must be elected president because the voice and will of the American people will have spoken.
Another significant factor to consider is that when compared to the last time Clinton ran for her party's nomination in 2008, the Democrat voting turnout has slipped by 20%. By all indications, the Republicans have increased voter turnout; however, it appears to be not enough for a Republican to win in the traditional blue states - even if Bernie fans decide to stay home should Clinton win the nomination.
What's more telling are the states in which Sanders beat Clinton handily, the ones who came to the polls determined to say "Never Hillary." Most of these are in the West and have also indicated that they are either conflicted about Donald Trump or they say "never" to him.
So what's the point? If the "Never Trump" voters stay home, Clinton wins handily. On the converse, if the "Never Cruz" voters, who appear to mainly reside in the Northeast, stay home, so what - the Republican nominee will not win these liberal leaning states but would have a good chance to best Hillary with the support of more conservative populated states. Bottom line - in a liberal vs. liberal match up in the 2016, Hillary wins by simply running in the party with which she openly identifies.
The moral of this story, based on factual numbers, is that the only way the Republican party wins the White House in 2016 will be if they have a nominee that paints with bold colors and offers a stark contrast to the progressive Democrat nominee. Trump nor Kasich fits this profile. Only one man - one candidate in this race does. Can you open your eyes and see who that is?
It’s time for This Week in Political Correctness magazine. Straight to our top story …
By Mouser the King Cat
Proving again that Hollywood has run out of ideas, Columbia Pictures is bringing out a new version of “Ghostbusters” with a twist -- the ghosts will be chased by women (Kate McKinnon, Kristen Wiig, Melissa McCarthy and Leslie Jones). Dan Aykroyd and Bill Murray will participate; the other original ghostbuster, Harold Ramis, passed away in 2014. Presumably the ghosts will be captured in a humorous fashion; I suppose they could take a look at McCarthy or Jones and be scared back into their primordial ooze. Release date is July 15.
Proving again that Hollywood has run out of ideas, Columbia Pictures is bringing out a new version of “Ghostbusters” with a twist -- the ghosts will be chased by women (Kate McKinnon, Kristen Wiig, Melissa McCarthy and Leslie Jones). Dan Aykroyd and Bill Murray will participate; the other original ghostbuster, Harold Ramis, passed away in 2014. Presumably the ghosts will be captured in a humorous fashion; I suppose they could take a look at McCarthy or Jones and be scared back into their primordial ooze. Release date is July 15.
BrietbartTech editor and Twitter star Milo Yiannopoulos (@nero) is making liberals’
heads explode on campus. Speaking at The American University, he also took on
wimpy mainstream conservatives: “They’ve been terrified of the left’s bogus
allegations of racism, they’ve been terrified of the left’s bogus allegations
of sexism, they’ve been terrified by the left’s hoaxes.” He infuriated protesters
by pledging $20 to the Donald Trump campaign and $50 to his college charity for
straight white males for every interruption. Did we mention Milo is gay?
Bill Nye
the Washed-Up Science Guy has suggested that climate change deniers be jailed.
Now his bowtie has been tweaked by John Coleman, founder of The Weather
Channel, who wrote in USA Today:
When all the scare talk is pushed aside, it
is the science that should be the basis for the debate. And the hard cold truth
is that the basic theory has failed. Many notable scientists reject man-made
global warming fears. … I share the deepest commitment to protecting our
planet. … However, I desperately want to get politics out of the climate
debate. The Paris climate agreement is all about empowering the U.N. and has
nothing to do with the climate.
Tuesday, April 26, 2016
Companies race to open the final frontier in tourism
Streets full of
people
All alone
Roads full of
houses
Never home
Church full of
singing
Out of tune
Everyone’s gone
to the moon
(written and sung
by Jonathan King in 1965)
There was intense
interest in man’s first visit to the moon when Mr. King, a native of London,
created that hit record. (I vaguely remember a couple of Americans getting to
the moon first.) Now nations and companies are plotting new excursions, all of
which seem unlikely to happen for a while.
Space tourism is
a different story. In the latest development, Bigelow Aerospace and United
Launch Alliance have announced plans to send up a space habitat by 2020. The
module could be hitched to the International Space Station or stand alone. From
the IFLScience website:
Other private
companies, including Sir Richard Branson’s Virgin Galactic and Jeff Bezos’ Blue
Origin, are also working on space tourism. Mr. Branson’s company has sold more
than 700 tickets, first at $200,000 and now for a cool quarter mil.
The ISS is
roughly the size of a football field and at any given time holds six
astronauts. Wonder if they’d cotton to neighbors? Then there’s the
claustrophobia. The nearby cafe might have great food, but there’s zilch
atmosphere.
#BathroomGate - Transgender or Forced Acceptance Issue?
by Kim D.
Businesses adopting the gender neutral restroom policy is about nothing more than trying to stay above the fray appealing to "Everyman." However, in doing so they are forgetting about the "Everywoman." Most women do not want to share the bathroom with one man, let alone tons of them. Take it just from me, one women living in a home with two males. Put aside the modesty factor and the possibility of pervert abuse, men are not the neatest when it comes to using the bathroom.
But is this new policy and cultural fad really about addressing the needs of the small transgender population residing in the U.S. or is it more about forced acceptance, much like the mandated servitude Christian photographers, bakers, and florists find themselves chained to when faced to either abandon their faith or lose their livelihood for denying services to gay weddings? Are business simply looking for the best way to avoid litigation? Opening restroom facilities to all in a gender-neutral manner will avoid offending the social justice warriors who are more likely to sue for forced acceptance. A simple disclaimer warning women to enter restrooms at their own risk could also avoid litigation if or when things go terribly wrong.
By all appearances, Target's new gender-neutral restroom policy specifically addresses sensitivities of transgender persons. Target explains its stance in this way:
The guy making the video was trying to prove a point. It's not about making a transgender male feel as if he is in an inclusive environment.
Unfortunately, Target has achieved the opposite of what its stated intent is. Many women shop at these stores, and a good portion of them now feel unaccepted and disrespected by this new policy. It is no surprise that Target finds itself in a public relations quagmire. The American Family Association is "targeting" the retail giant and calling for a boycott of its stores until the policy is reversed:
Businesses adopting the gender neutral restroom policy is about nothing more than trying to stay above the fray appealing to "Everyman." However, in doing so they are forgetting about the "Everywoman." Most women do not want to share the bathroom with one man, let alone tons of them. Take it just from me, one women living in a home with two males. Put aside the modesty factor and the possibility of pervert abuse, men are not the neatest when it comes to using the bathroom.
But is this new policy and cultural fad really about addressing the needs of the small transgender population residing in the U.S. or is it more about forced acceptance, much like the mandated servitude Christian photographers, bakers, and florists find themselves chained to when faced to either abandon their faith or lose their livelihood for denying services to gay weddings? Are business simply looking for the best way to avoid litigation? Opening restroom facilities to all in a gender-neutral manner will avoid offending the social justice warriors who are more likely to sue for forced acceptance. A simple disclaimer warning women to enter restrooms at their own risk could also avoid litigation if or when things go terribly wrong.
By all appearances, Target's new gender-neutral restroom policy specifically addresses sensitivities of transgender persons. Target explains its stance in this way:
However, a video going viral demonstrates that Target is simply caving to what it believes is the most volatile political correctness issue of the day and are not focused on equality and equity:
The guy making the video was trying to prove a point. It's not about making a transgender male feel as if he is in an inclusive environment.
Unfortunately, Target has achieved the opposite of what its stated intent is. Many women shop at these stores, and a good portion of them now feel unaccepted and disrespected by this new policy. It is no surprise that Target finds itself in a public relations quagmire. The American Family Association is "targeting" the retail giant and calling for a boycott of its stores until the policy is reversed:
Corporate America must stop bullying people who disagree with the radical left agenda to remake society into their progressive image. #BoycottTarget has resonated with Americans. Target’s harmful policy poses a danger to women and children. Predators and voyeurs would take advantage of the policy to prey on those who are vulnerable. It’s clear now that many customers agree. Target shoppers are leaving their allegiance to the store behind—and by the thousands every hour. No store can withstand that sort of loss.The American Family Association even goes further to ensure it is not advocating for discrimination of transgender persons. The solution is for Target to install a separate gender neutral restroom for the instances where a person truly would not feel comfortable sharing the pee experience with a specific gender. It's a costly option for Target but the only one which would achieve the goal stated in its new restroom policy.
Michelle Obama Lunch Rules Ban Fried Foods, Frosted Flakes in Daycare
WFB
New rules stemming from the school lunch law championed by first lady Michelle Obama are banning popular children’s cereals like Frosted Flakes in daycare centers.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Service issued a final rule Monday that will affect more than 3 million kids in daycare centers across the country. The regulation will only allow daycare centers to serve juice once a day, will ban fried foods, and encourages centers to not add honey to a child’s yogurt... READ MORE
New rules stemming from the school lunch law championed by first lady Michelle Obama are banning popular children’s cereals like Frosted Flakes in daycare centers.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Service issued a final rule Monday that will affect more than 3 million kids in daycare centers across the country. The regulation will only allow daycare centers to serve juice once a day, will ban fried foods, and encourages centers to not add honey to a child’s yogurt... READ MORE
Monday, April 25, 2016
Pity the PC whipped
By Mouser the King Cat
Distressing stories like this trickle in every day, but this one hit home because of my assistant’s interest in the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. The staff of the school’s newspaper, The Rebel Yell, has decided to change its name to something more PC. Presumably the athletic teams will continue to be known as the Rebels. For now.
Distressing stories like this trickle in every day, but this one hit home because of my assistant’s interest in the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. The staff of the school’s newspaper, The Rebel Yell, has decided to change its name to something more PC. Presumably the athletic teams will continue to be known as the Rebels. For now.
Next
in the crosshairs is the school’s mascot, Hey Reb! From the Las Vegas Sun:
The
mascot, created … by a local cartoonist, was based on 19th-century mountain men
who explored western states like Nevada and California. Some students say the
mascot more closely resembles a Confederate general. (Never mind that the
previous mascot, deposed in 1997, was a cartoon Confederate general.)
The
school’s Rebel nickname has nothing to do with the Civil War, during which
Nevada was ushered into statehood on the Union side. It instead addresses
politics and how a distant outpost of the state’s first university,
Nevada-Reno, claimed its independence after a long battle. The nickname was put
up to a student vote in the early 1970s and passed muster by a wide margin.
From
the school website: UNLV acknowledges that its first generation of students
opted for a great name in Rebels but chose to surround it with imagery and
symbols that fell short of giving that name the honor it deserved. UNLV also
acknowledges the persistent and courageous students of a later generation who
decided to keep the great Rebels name and to create a mascot that was
representative of Nevada and could be embraced by all!
Sweetheart,
get me rewrite. Can you even be called a rebel if you are PC whipped?
Sunday, April 24, 2016
EBT Shutdown 2016
Here's What They DON'T Want You To Know!!!
As early as 1999, your government has been initiating biometric identification systems to be equipped with EBT/SNAP cards (See Documents Below). According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food and Nutrition Service, such a program will be enforced "in order to protect food stamps program fraud." Not only that, but many of these biometrics will require finger imaging, if not facial recognition. As of September 1999, nine states have already agreed and accepted to such program. You can only imagine the progression your government and other "participating" states have made within these past seventeen years...
But That's Not All!
In 2016 alone, the government is looking to cut over 500,000 people from their SNAP/EBT benefits, and could cut up to over 1 million within a three-month period. And if you thought that was bad, governments and state representatives alike are looking to cut from those who need it the most (See CBPP Document Below). Not to mention other program cuts the government is conspiring to do, along with other plans for depopulation (See U.N. Agenda 2030 for more!)
BUT THAT'S NOT ALL!!!
WHAT ARE THEY REALLY GETTING READY FOR????
In October 2013 and September 2015, America experienced a nationwide EBT shutdown. Of course, such a shutdown was blamed on a "computer glitch" and NOT a "government shutdown," but either way, THIS SHOULD BE RINGING SOME SERIOUS ALARM BELLS!!!
Now the question we should be wondering is WHY?
WHY would the government need to implement biometric identification systems (or a potential RFID chip) for food stamps? WHY have they been TESTING the EBT shutdown, and even cutting close to 1 million Americans (if not more) from EBT in this year alone?WHY all the reported EBT "failures" within the past few months alone?
And WHAT could be the Bigger Agenda ahead?
THE TRUTH REVEALED!!!
NOW IS THE TIME TO PREPARE! THE URGENCY IS NOW! PLEASE SEEK YAHUAH AND HIS TRUE SON YAHUSHA — THAT WAY ALL MAY BE WELL WITH YOU AND YOUR FAMILY!!!!!!!
As early as 1999, your government has been initiating biometric identification systems to be equipped with EBT/SNAP cards (See Documents Below). According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food and Nutrition Service, such a program will be enforced "in order to protect food stamps program fraud." Not only that, but many of these biometrics will require finger imaging, if not facial recognition. As of September 1999, nine states have already agreed and accepted to such program. You can only imagine the progression your government and other "participating" states have made within these past seventeen years...
But That's Not All!
In 2016 alone, the government is looking to cut over 500,000 people from their SNAP/EBT benefits, and could cut up to over 1 million within a three-month period. And if you thought that was bad, governments and state representatives alike are looking to cut from those who need it the most (See CBPP Document Below). Not to mention other program cuts the government is conspiring to do, along with other plans for depopulation (See U.N. Agenda 2030 for more!)
BUT THAT'S NOT ALL!!!
WHAT ARE THEY REALLY GETTING READY FOR????
In October 2013 and September 2015, America experienced a nationwide EBT shutdown. Of course, such a shutdown was blamed on a "computer glitch" and NOT a "government shutdown," but either way, THIS SHOULD BE RINGING SOME SERIOUS ALARM BELLS!!!
Now the question we should be wondering is WHY?
WHY would the government need to implement biometric identification systems (or a potential RFID chip) for food stamps? WHY have they been TESTING the EBT shutdown, and even cutting close to 1 million Americans (if not more) from EBT in this year alone?WHY all the reported EBT "failures" within the past few months alone?
And WHAT could be the Bigger Agenda ahead?
THE TRUTH REVEALED!!!
NOW IS THE TIME TO PREPARE! THE URGENCY IS NOW! PLEASE SEEK YAHUAH AND HIS TRUE SON YAHUSHA — THAT WAY ALL MAY BE WELL WITH YOU AND YOUR FAMILY!!!!!!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)