Not satisfied with having achieved a state debt of $424 BILLION dollars, which is growing exponentially with no end in sight, California's septuagenarian Governor, Jerry "Moonbeam" Brown, who will shortly be 77 years old, had the nerve, if not ideologically related idiocy, to come out and attack Republican Senator Ted Cruz, as Cruz announced his candidacy for the Republican presidential nomination.
Brown's attack wasn't just your run of the mill liberal claptrap. No, it was apparently based solely upon the fact that Brown sees Cruz as a "climate denier". Brown has either slipped into senility or he has bought into Al Gore's nauseating mantra of the imminent end of the world because of global warming, now changed to global climate change, since the world hasn't warmed for over 18 years, an inconvenient fact that eco-fascists like to gloss over.
Watch this video of Brown's delirium.
Not satisfied with having achieved a state debt of $424 BILLION dollars, which is growing exponentially with no end in sight, California's septuagenarian Governor, Jerry "Moonbeam" Brown, who will shortly be 77 years old, had the nerve, if not ideologically related idiocy, to come out and attack Republican Senator Ted Cruz, as Cruz announced his candidacy for the Republican presidential nomination.
Brown's attack wasn't just your run of the mill liberal claptrap. No, it was apparently based solely upon the fact that Brown sees Cruz as a "climate denier". Brown has either slipped into senility or he has bought into Al Gore's nauseating mantra of the imminent end of the world because of global warming, now changed to global climate change, since the world hasn't warmed for over 18 years, an inconvenient fact that eco-fascists like to gloss over.
But let's not quibble about whether Brown is nuts or just suffering from advanced Alzheimer's diease. According to Jerry Brown, and by association with the Al Gore school of scientific idiocy, global climate change is settled science. News flash. Science is never settled and there is no such thing as a consensus in the physical sciences. That's a term relegated to the "social sciences", of which politics is one branch of the social sciences.
Brown raised the false canard that 90 percent plus (liberals claim 97%) of scientists agree that there is global warming. This number was long ago debunked as false, yet liberals, including President Obama, continue to throw it out as if to say the debate is over, game, set, match.
Hold on there.
...the assertion that 97% of scientists believe that climate change is a man-made, urgent problem is a fiction. The so-called consensus comes from a handful of surveys and abstract-counting exercises that have been contradicted by more reliable research. WSJ
What becomes much more interesting is the fact that California, lead by a governor who, trapped in a 1960's hippie mind set, does not and will not acknowledge that there is no way for California to ever go completely green in energy production or anywhere close to it. There simply is not enough geography to plaster solar panels and windmills across the state and there is no modern means to store green energy, short of an Energizer Bunny the size of the Sierra Nevada Mountains.
The truth to green energy production from wind and solar is that they do not produce the necessary power at the times of greatest consumption. They are unstable sources of energy production, whereas coal and natural gas provide a relatively stable electrical grid for reliably distributing cheap electrical energy to consumers and industry.
The American economy needs cheap and reliable electrical energy production in order to remain competitive in a global economy. Forcing consumers and industry to accept the higher costs of green energy production is an economic disaster, which eventually destroys American jobs and forces American companies to outsource more and more of their manufacturing to offshore suppliers.
So who is the actual "denier" here. I say it's Jerry Brown, stuck in the 60's, who has no clue what it takes to run a state and foster growth and development of a vibrant and expanding economy and continues to "deny" the fact that fossil fuels will be the major source of energy for the foreseeable future.
The above commentary was prepared from the following additional sources:
No comments:
Post a Comment