Donald Trump, by all
accounts, has won the New York GOP primary. Let's put that in
perspective for a moment. The problem is that Hillary and Bernie
individually garnered more votes in the New York Democratic primary than
did Donald Trump in the Republican primary. In the general election
New York is a given for the Democratic candidate.
The
GOP presidential campaign reminds me of the Civil War where the CSA won
more battles than did the Union, but, in the end, the CSA lost the war
to a disparate Union that came together to defeat the CSA.
Donald
Trump has tried to create a political party primary in his mind's eye,
but that obviates reality. Primaries aren't about direct elections of
the people and they never were. Political parties are private
organizations that create their own operating rules.
Trump
wants to pander to the populist idea that the primary process is an
exercise in direct democracy. That's not, nor has it ever been, the
guiding principle upon which political party primaries are conducted.
The
most important principle a party follows in a primary process, be it
Republican or Democratic, is to win the most important election of all
the elections and that's the presidential election. The party is
concerned with winning the presidential election and not particularly
nominating the most popular candidate, who only has the support of a
plurality of the voters in the primary process.
The
primary process is meant to be a shakeout of candidates to see who is
the most electable in the general election and, as it stands today,
Donald Trump is the least electable among Ted Cruz and even John Kasich.
Donald
Trump, the political amateur, bangs the drum over "fairness" and
"democracy" using all kinds of other nonsense, despite the GOP rules to
the contrary, and wants and expects the GOP to come to heel to his
demands that the candidate with a plurality of delegate votes in the
convention, should win the nomination ipso facto because he says it's
only "fair".
The GOP primary process, not that
much different than the Democratic primary process, is a representative
process to nominate the most electable candidate for the party in the
general election. It's the party regulars in every state, county,
congressional district and precinct who have the pulse of the party
voters and believe they know who is the most electable candidate for the
party to support. Are these people always right? Maybe not, but in
the end it is the candidate chosen by the delegates who must win the
general election by promoting a campaign superior to the opposing
candidate.
So, where does all this leave the Republican Party and the voters?
It's
still problematical whether Donald Trump will accumulate the necessary
1237 delegate votes prior to the GOP convention in July. Should Trump
fail to win the 1237 delegate votes going into the convention, it then
raises the question of how the convention will shake out. Will it be
Ted Cruz or someone else like John Kasich? It should be remembered that
Kasich has even less committed delegates than Marco Rubio, who has
already dropped out.
Republican voters realize
that ultimately it will come down to a delegate vote between Trump and
Cruz. In that scenario the political pros see a Cruz victory despite
some party animosity toward Cruz, although such animosity is far less
than that shown toward Trump.
The
least likely scenario for the GOP convention would be some "White
Knight" trotted out by the RNC to "save the day". The RNC isn't stupid
and that scenario will never play out. The RNC is more likely to get
behind Cruz, albeit reluctantly, who the RNC believes it can live with
in the end and win the general election on November 8th.
The
GOP will, in the end, move to support Ted Cruz after a first or second
ballot. In the end the nomination will go to the candidate who has
played the primary process by the existing rules with the greatest
political skill in the 50 states and other remaining U.S. territories
and that candidate would be Ted Cruz.
Now all we can do is wait out the process to see which scenario comes to fruition.
No comments:
Post a Comment