By Elizabeth Nelson
We have to laugh at Obama and the only transparent thing
he does, never letting a tragedy go to waste. Even his media lapdogs over-sell the lead
stories with, "Deadly mass-shooting," because there are various types
of mass shootings?
However, leave it to our feckless leader to go to Paris, France and bash America's "lack of
gun control" and renew his "pledged to
remain focused on using executive action to enact new controls where possible."
The irony and timing of his speech wasn't missed on me, because the Paris attack happened in a gun-free zone, and happened because of their strict gun-laws. So, why would America want to emulate this in our Country? It obviously did not save their citizens, did it?
Of course, as Obama is rushing around D.C., screaming at
them to "do something" about "stricter gun laws" and telling
the French that he will use his empiric pen if they don't. What he's neglecting
to do is tell everyone the truth behind his distortion of the "truth"
as he's created it.
Would you like to know why he's all puffed up like a
poisonous toad? Through all the
pomp-and-circumstance, he doesn't want his fanatical obama-zombies to
understand the real facts and dirty truth about the San Bernardino shooting and
his push for stricter national gun-regulations.
Not only did the shooting in San Bernardino happen in a
state with some of the strictest gun laws and universal background checks for
all gun purchases, but Authorities say they believe attackers Syed Rizwan Farook
and wife Tashfeen Malik had legally obtained two handguns
and that the two rifles were also legally purchased in California.
The FBI said Farook legally
bought the two handguns used in the attack — purchases that would have required
a background check. And there is no indication he or Malik had any criminal
record or history of mental illness that would have triggered California's
unique law allowing authorities to seize weapons from those who aren't allowed
to own them. Read
more ABC News
So, Obama, since California already had strict gun-laws
and didn't need your gun-reform, your advice wouldn't have helped these
victims, or prevented this attack, right?
When asked this exact question, by White House Media Pool, Josh Earnest admits
that Obama's gun-laws wouldn't have
stopped this shooting. Oh, but wait until you hear his "final
answer."
"We want to make it harder for people to carry these
future crimes out..."
Then, by your logic, Josh. If we want to make it harder for people to
get killed in drunk driving accidents, shouldn't we reduce the number of cars
that are on the road and decrease the speed limit to 55, so the fatality rate
is lower?
What about Obama's beloved Chicago. There should be no
gun-violence there, as they have some of the strictest gun-laws there, right? Obama had the audacity said that Americans with guns
are more of a threat than terrorist. Obama's delusions
grow deeper still. I'm not sure what universe Obama's living in, but "terrorists
will stop attacking, if we pass gun-control laws."
So, gun-haters, this was just another gun-free zone and
another state with strict gun laws, which goes back to what we "bitter
clingers" have been saying all along.
People with murderous intent will never obey your stupid gun-laws, let
alone the one law, "thou shalt not commit murder." We don't have a gun problem, we have a people
problem.
Only when we stop allowing a
divisive talking head to divide us and tell us what to think and feel and start
doing it for ourselves again, will we start uniting our country and get back on
the right track.
No comments:
Post a Comment