data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/278b6/278b62ea96e2023527c9bc173d7acffd998b274e" alt=""
If Putin is allowed to continue with his Middle East meddling unchecked by the Obama administration, pretty soon Earnest will have to change his "checkers"symbolism to one which more closely resembles the game of Risk. As stated before, Putin's interest in the Syrian conflict is proving to be in no way a humanitarian gesture.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed658/ed658f3c9c0798e578f8c6fa9ba7bd5fba12cd17" alt=""
So back to the original question . . . if Putin is playing checkers, what game is Obama playing? Americans have seen the strategy of Sorry as Obama took office and immediately went on an apology tour, giving the first indication that his administration would be significantly weak in regard to foreign policy.
Or does it appear Kerry and Obama are stuck in a wacky game of Boggle (junior edition). To the average American watching the Syrian conflict play out, the guys in charge of forming the most effective strategy appear to be overwhelmed and bewildered.
To some it may appear they are playing a game of Clue, although even presented with clear facts on who's causing the problem, where, and with what, there's no guarantee America would formulate a successful strategy to meet its stated end goal of destroying ISIS and eliminating the Assad Regime.
Personally, I think Obama and Kerry are caught up in a huge game of Twister. Putin seems to the the one setting the spinner in motion, telling players which foot or hand to place where.
No comments:
Post a Comment