Rand Paul Pushes Democrats to Defend Their Stance on Abortion and When Unborn Babies have Rights

By Elizabeth Nelson

When politics and abortion are used in the same sentence, eyes generally start rolling into the back of people's head and the grumbling usually starts.  Most of the time it's mumbling about how "Republicans want to deny women birth control" and "conservatives want to control women's bodies." 

However, now Republicans like President hopeful Rand Paul are turning the tables on the Democrats like brainless DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

It all started last Wednesday in New Hampshire when a CNN reporter asked Senator Paul to clarify his stance on exemptions to abortion restrictions.

“You go back and you ask Debbie Wasserman Schultz if she’s OK with killing a seven-pound baby that is just not yet born yet,” Paul responded.

Paul thinks we on the right have made our position quite clear and it's time that the right stops defending our stance and starts getting the left to start justifying their position and expose their radical views on abortion and killing babies. Do they really feel justified in killing a 7 pound baby in the third trimester and voting against the late-term abortion bills time and time again?

Paul has suggested that Wasserman Schultz and the DNC endorse the “killing” of babies and Wasserman Schultz has, in turn, insinuated that Paul would be willing to “let a woman die” if her life were endangered by pregnancy.

Wasserman did answer his question: “Here’s an answer,” wrote Wasserman Schultz that same day. “I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved. Period. End of story.”  Read more Daily Beast

What he is trying to do is show how radical the Democratic ideals are, regarding abortion, and how Democrats aren't just stripping our rights, but denying unborn babies their rights.  Remember what Barbara Boxer said?  It's not a "baby" with rights, "until you bring it home from the hospital." So, a botched abortion, where the baby is breathing and viable, would be allowed to suffer and die, if she were the attending physician.

“I think when you bring your baby home, when your baby is born … the baby belongs to your family and has all the rights.” Read more Catholic Register

So, maybe the GOP is on the right track here.  Stop arguing over our beliefs and defending what we stand for and start making them not only state what they stand for but defend it.  Are you willing to kill an 8-month-old baby, even after a botched abortion? How radical are they? Better still, are the American people as "pro-choice" as they think they are, and would they choose adoption if they knew procrastinators were killing viable babies, "just because I can?"

   

It's sad to think that something so beautiful and a process so miraculous can be discarded so effortlessly, as if being tossed away like snot in Kleenex, instead of the new life that was never asked to be created.   Now, according to this Administration, abortion and killing babies is considered Health Care. 

If it's a "woman's right" to kill, it should also be her "responsibility" to pay for the cleanup and prevention, if she chooses, since she put herself in that situation. Myself and every other US taxpayer weren't invited into her bedroom. Therefore if she doesn't want our opinion, she shouldn't ask for our wallet.